THE NGO NETWORK ALLIANCE PROJECT - an online community for Zimbabwean activists  
 View archive by sector
 
 
    HOME THE PROJECT DIRECTORYJOINARCHIVESEARCH E:ACTIVISMBLOGSMSFREEDOM FONELINKS CONTACT US
 

 


Back to Index

Critical reflections on the role of an international NGO seeking to work globally on land rights
Robin Palmer, Oxfam GB
December 31, 2005

http://www.oxfam.org.uk/resources/learning/landrights/south.html

Download this document
- Rich Text Format version (240KB)
- Acrobat PDF version (203KB
)
If you do not have the free Acrobat reader on your computer, download it from the Adobe website by clicking here.

Paper for International Conference, Social Movements Perspectives: Land, Poverty, Social Justice and Development, Institute of Social Studies (ISS), The Hague, 9-10 January 2006.

Introduction
In this paper I shall be exploring some of the dimensions of an international NGO seeking to work globally on land rights. Struggles for land rights continue to form a vital part of the wider fight for global justice, for poverty reduction, sustainable livelihoods and equality - as this audience will be very well aware. It is clear that the clumsy imposition of liberalisation, the rolling back of the role of the state and of state marketing boards, grain reserves and the like, combined with manifestly unfair international trade rules, have left many people living in poverty far more vulnerable than they once were and far more dependent on access to land than ever before --- while that very access is increasingly threatened in a globalising world.

I shall draw upon my own work as Oxfam GB's Global Land Adviser and also on Oxfam's 1historical experiences. In the first part I take a brief historical look at some of Oxfam's work on land rights, followed by the recent involvement of the British Government development agency DFID in land rights in Africa, by Oxfam's engagement on land rights with the World Bank, and a brief word on USAID. In the second part I examine some of Oxfam's work on land rights in Southern Africa over the past two decades. I should make it clear that I am writing (and perhaps speaking) as an individual rather than representing some official Oxfam perspective, though I recognise the ambiguities inherent in this.

An international NGO (INGO) of Oxfam's size and longevity (founded in 1942) obviously has a lot of things going for it - resources, offices throughout much of the world, long-established partnerships with local organisations and social movements, brand recognition, substantial programme and advocacy experience, and a growing reputation as an international campaigner for social and economic justice 2. But to engage in land rights is obviously to enter hugely sensitive and highly political terrain at a national level where a nuanced understandingis absolutely critical. Clearly, awareness of this is acutely necessary as are judgements about the appropriate role of an INGO in any particular context - I discuss this further in the section on Mozambique.

INGOs can in theory play a critical series of roles - lobbying governments to listen to civil society, to adopt long term perspectives and to learn from other experiences; lobbying donors to do likewise; bringing relevant experience from elsewhere to bear; challenging simplistic magic 'solutions' a la de Soto 3; making information as freely available as possible and in relevant languages; supporting and strengthening the work of local NGOs; and - with appropriate sensitivity and humility - bringing their influence and reputation to bear in what are often defensive struggles in support of poor people's land rights.

A decade ago Oxfam and comparable agencies were far more constrained by UK Charity Law than is now the case; the boundaries have been expanded following years of increasingly assertive campaigning work on international trade and other global issues by UK-based INGOs.

In its non-humanitarian work, Oxfam traditionally prefers to work through local partners rather than go it alone (be operational), and so its typical role is that of offering appropriate support to partners advocating for the land - and other - rights of people living in poverty.

Download full document 


  1. In this paper I shall just use 'Oxfam', for simplicity. I am employed by Oxfam GB but have also worked at times for Oxfam International. The latter is a confederation of 12 organisations in America, Australia, Belgium, Canada, Germany, Great Britain, Hong Kong, Ireland, Netherlands, New Zealand, Spain, Quebec. The members frequently combine on campaigning work and at times, as in Angola and Mozambique, some of the affiliates run joint advocacy programmes.
  2. For example, Make Trade Fair http://www.maketradefair.com/en/index.htm Make Poverty History http://www.makepovertyhistory.org/ and Control Arms http://www.controlarms.org/
  3. Hernando de Soto, The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else (New York; Basic Books, 2000).

Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.

TOP